> Some enterprise software already works like that (especially to generate Web/mobile/desktop versions from the same code & description). Can you name a few?

> Some enterprise software already works like that (especially to generate Web/mobile/desktop versions from the same code & description). Can you name a few? > And I would argue against software being "one size fits all". Different styles approaches might make software unattractive for some users, but in the same way can be the critical decider towards your software for other users. Look at the mountains of different text editors out there. They all edit text completely fine and have tons of overlapping features, but they still can be a near religious topic. I meant that software that currently exists is 'one size fits all', and that we should get away from this. > You can't automate support for different language. And other people might use a competitor that doesn't even have threads, because that's their preferred style. Not if software can adapt to its user's needs.