Good information in The New Yorker piece, unlike the continuing coverage I have been reading in Bloomberg, which uses fracking as a refrain with minimal informa

Good information in The New Yorker piece, unlike the continuing coverage I have been reading in Bloomberg, which uses fracking as a refrain with minimal information attached. This is about disposal of waste water from watered-out fields, not about fracking. The New Yorker correctly points out less than 10% of the water going down these disposal wells is from fracking operations. So why does Bloomberg (and not just Bloomberg) keep raising the fracking bogey-man?