3 ms·
What I find particularly interesting, is that the "accredited lab" (presumably accredited by the FDA), just came back with a (misleading) negative result, but t
by ghshephard 11y ago
What I find particularly interesting, is that the "accredited lab" (presumably accredited by the FDA), just came back with a (misleading) negative result, but that 23andMe, which presumably was not accredited by the FDA at the time, provided results that cleared the issue up.
- maxerickson 11y agoIt's an issue of the question they were (perhaps implicitly) asked, not competence. For example: http://www.dnacenter.com/dna-testing/paternal-lineage.html http://www.dnacenter.com/dna-testing/paternal-lineage.html
- pcrh 11y agoFinding that the father has contributed ~1/4 of his genes to the child would normally exclude them from being described as the biological parent, who would normally contribute ~1/2 his genes to the child. Possibly the father had no brothers, therefore no-one else could contribute even 1/4 of the genes (unless the child is a chimera from two fathers...).
- Udik 11y agoWell, they are his genes. Just not for the whole body.