3 ms·
They still use pull requests, though, just in the form of email-based ones. https://git-scm.com/docs/git-request-pull https://git-scm.com/docs/git-request-pull
by Jasper_ 11y ago
They still use pull requests, though, just in the form of email-based ones.
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-request-pull https://git-scm.com/docs/git-request-pull
- jumpwah 11y agoExcept that's not a "pull request".
- Vendan 11y agoExcept it is. Just cause github does pull requests differently doesn't mean you can't do pull requests in pure git. Remember, git came before github.
- jumpwah 11y ago> Remember, git came before github. That's exactly my point. Using a "request-pull" instead of a "pull-request" will probably mean you can do this git-lfs thing with it. My understanding was that it was not working with "forked" repositories, which you need to have to make a "pull request". To make a "request pull" (or to just send a patch file), you don't need to "fork". ;)
- paulddraper 11y agoSure. With git-fu and enough emails, you can replicate anything done in GitHub. I'm just saying it's a very odd choice for an example of GitHub screwing over workflows.