Not meant as criticism, but a (maybe fruitless) theoretical discusson: Even with RumpRun on true bare metal, should that be called "Bare Metal Erlang"? It's no

Not meant as criticism, but a (maybe fruitless) theoretical discusson: Even with RumpRun on true bare metal, should that be called "Bare Metal Erlang"? It's not like the erlang code manages the raw memory, contains a driver for the hard disk controller etc. Clearly there are fewer layers between the erlang code and the bare metal compared to a traditional OS, but still plenty and they do quite a lot of work.