This is such a banal and not-constructive comment. Of course he would think about architectural choices. Your comment suggests one of the following: 1. The pro

This is such a banal and not-constructive comment. Of course he would think about architectural choices. Your comment suggests one of the following: 1. The proposed feature is harder than other proposed features (which ones and why? edit: it turns out there isn't even a proposed feature here...) 2. You see pitfalls or good choices and bad choices (which ones and why?) Either way, your comment as it stands isn't helpful in the slightest, and I'm calling shenanigans. If you are in either camp 1 or camp 2, why not actually say something useful instead of speaking from this glass pedestal of falsified authority. edit: formatting.