3 ms·
So, we can "rise again" by fixing some nit-picky things like filling potholes and giving California (a bankrupt entity) more US Representatives. Thanks for the
by mynameishere 17y ago
So, we can "rise again" by fixing some nit-picky things like filling potholes and giving California (a bankrupt entity) more US Representatives. Thanks for the tips. Actually, the roads around where I live are pretty good.
the absolute pillars of American strength: continued openness to immigration, and a continued concentration of universities that people around the world want to attend.
Whatever you think of immigration, there's really a logical problem with the above thought. America is a place that consists of people, who are solely responsible for America's greatness...NOT theoretical future inflows of other people. His assertion can't be tested. It's a guess, no different than saying: "My upcoming policy of betting red on the roulette wheel is the source of my wealth. Because it worked before."
China and India are the countries on the ascendancy right now [1] and they are not rapidly replacing themselves with other nations, and would probably not appreciate the suggestion that doing so would be the "pillar" of their strength. This writer, of course, had to say it because it's ideologically required thinking.
[1] The US's ascendancy can be roughly marked from 1920 to 1965, a period of very low immigration.
- gills 17y agoRe: immigration...some folks appear to believe a population Ponzi scheme is just the carpet under which to sweep the fallout from decades of [government] financial Ponzi schemes.
- ajross 17y agoJust to pick on one point: what conceivable moral logic leads one to choose democratic representation based on the financial health of their existing government? I just can't see where that comes from. What's next: people with net credit debt are worth 3/5 of a non-slave?
- catzaa 17y ago> Just to pick on one point: what conceivable moral logic leads one to choose democratic representation based on the financial health of their existing government? Wasn't the idea to give each state to senators so that populous states do not encroach on less populous states? If California gets many senators, they will surely vote to get federal money to fix their deficit.