4 ms·
I could be reading this wrong but I believe the California figure is for a single year (fiscal year 2009-2010) while the Texas figure covers two years (the 2008
by pauldino 17y ago
I could be reading this wrong but I believe the California figure is for a single year (fiscal year 2009-2010) while the Texas figure covers two years (the 2008-2009 biennial).
- emmett 17y agoI believe you are correct! See http://www.texasbudgetsource.com/texas-budget-overview http://www.texasbudgetsource.com/texas-budget-overview
- krakensden 17y agoThe chart says 85.7 billion in 2008, 82.1 billion in 2009, and the text claims $167 for the 2008-2009 biennial. That's slightly higher than the per-year figure in the original comment: I don't think he's correct.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]