3 ms·
Ah. In context, it sounds quite a lot less ominous than title of the OP. Of course they have to address it. How is the question.
by aggieben 11y ago
Ah. In context, it sounds quite a lot less ominous than title of the OP. Of course they have to address it. How is the question.
- declan 11y agoWell, it's testimony to a lawmaking body. Congress drafts laws, not technical standards; the FBI is there to talk about laws. :) If you keep reading, you'll see the FBI is not demanding new encryption-related laws "at this time."
- Zigurd 11y agoIt is well-known that the FBI director's position is that laws should require the use of back-doored encryption. His position is both ominous and one that has been refuted by a preponderance of experts as dangerous and impractical.