8 ms·
I haven't read that yet (though I definitely will later) but that's interesting about the dairy findings. West Price found the exact opposite of that in his bo
by jseifer 17y ago
I haven't read that yet (though I definitely will later) but that's interesting about the dairy findings. West Price found the exact opposite of that in his book (http://bit.ly/4MIoVe http://bit.ly/4MIoVe). Can you elaborate a bit more on what they found suspect?
- nunb 17y agoFood for thought, Dr Eades on the issue. http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/obesity/another-china-study/ http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/obesity/another-china-stu... I also read somewhere (probably Eades) that the China Study (the book/Campbell one) was a survey, iow, not an intervention study. Lastly, when I read the China Study book about 3-4 years ago, it started off with an impressive anecdote about feeding extra protein (peanut butter) to filipino children to improve their diet and wham! cancer. Blame protein, or aflatoxin? Campbell chose the former. Now that I know a bit more about animal vs. nut (soy, peanut) protein, I'll take the former, thanks. The Panu weblog puts it in the simplest terms: choose a food whose defense is to run away from you, not one that will cook up chemical defenses to being eaten.