3 ms·
The problem with your argument is that you can rationalise anything that way - "that's just the way it is". Which is why I asked what you would consider spooky.
by akvadrako 11y ago
The problem with your argument is that you can rationalise anything that way - "that's just the way it is". Which is why I asked what you would consider spooky. If you don't consider anything within the realm of observable phenomena spooky, then you are essentially just defining spooky differently than other people.
- dools 11y agoIt's not the "spooky" part that I have a problem with, it's the "action at a distance" part. Things can be spooky or not spooky subjectively, but there is no action at a distance.