Would there be a difference in result when only the computer looked at the individual positions, logged the measurements, determined them and noted the level of

Would there be a difference in result when only the computer looked at the individual positions, logged the measurements, determined them and noted the level of quantum behaviour to test this hypothesis? I read this thread on the physics stackexchange http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/110488/consciousness-causes-collapse-interpretation-or-free-will-excluded-by-quantum http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/110488/consciousn... ..and it is said most professional physicists don't believe in this 'consciousness (human or otherwise) causes collapse' Neumann-Wigner interpretation (and that of John Wheeler and Henri Stapps) and most amateurs do, but has it been tested in this way also by ruling out far out psi effects like retropsychokinesis by deleting or encrypting the data in such a way it can only be verified by a 'team' of independent artificial scientists (networked statistical software)?