3 ms·
That can't be right. There are so many spurious correlations that obviously imply nothing. There's got to be some other required factor before correlation can
by graeme 11y ago
That can't be right. There are so many spurious correlations that obviously imply nothing.
There's got to be some other required factor before correlation can imply causation. Like "if there's reason to believe something is relevant, and there is correlation, then that implies causation. "
- stephengillie 11y agoBut a "reason to believe something is relevant" is a prejudged correlation.
- taejo 11y agoimply, v. ... (transitive, of a person or proposition) to hint; to insinuate; to suggest tacitly and avoid a direct statement