4 ms·
I find the response to these articles often very baffling. Everyone seems to want to nail these banksters for dodging taxes using clever loopholes. Then, they r
by vonklaus 11y ago
I find the response to these articles often very baffling. Everyone seems to want to nail these banksters for dodging taxes using clever loopholes. Then, they rail against government incompetence and praise people who work within a narrow framework while getting results ("hackers"). Obviously, this is a generalization and not every person thinks this way, but I often find this sort of response on places like reddit and even here to some extent.
If the Federal Gov't wants tax money it better start making a strong case with some serious value propositions. Realize, that post-civil war the Federal Income Tax was allowed to expire, even for funding the war it was only 10%. It had been ruled unconstitutional.[0]People don't want to give the government money at a corporate or personal level. And if they would stop buying warehouses of hammers and dumping it into the middleeast funding helicopters that will never fly and powerplants that don't work, maybe people would at lease be neutral, instead of downright hostile, about the issues of taxes.
[0]http://www.eoearth.org/view/article/153529/ http://www.eoearth.org/view/article/153529/
- zouhair 11y agoPoor rich, they are a persecuted minority.
- vonklaus 11y agoMy point, which I didn't explicitly state, is that maybe instead of demonizing the rich for tax evasion we should be doing more to help the poor and middle class achieve these same ends. Obviously, building a strong economy and job creation are much more important, but lowering taxes and allocating the money the government does have, should be important goals going forward.
- dredmorbius 11y agoThe Hivemind tells me there is no Hivemind.
- iofj 11y agoAt times like this it is worth remembering that "wealth" accounts, the ones the banksters are "tax optimizing" for their clients, start at $5000 balance or so and the average is in fact no higher than $45000. I don't know, but I do think that the people these accounts belong to could easily in fact be the "top-50%" and not so much the "top-1%". Hence the baffling response.