4 ms·
But, this begs the question, as it assumes equality or fairness in the old standard. The point seems to be that this is not the case, thus provisions are requi
by unclebucknasty 11y ago
But, this begs the question, as it assumes equality or fairness in the old standard.
The point seems to be that this is not the case, thus provisions are required as a means of correction.
- dnautics 11y agono such assumption. The statement at the end is that there in inequality created at the end. I.E. there will be winners and losers. Now you could argue that the 'right correction' would create the 'right winners and right losers' but I think historically, almost all of the best-intentioned corrections applied by the states have ultimately hurt the dispossessed.