I think that is a lot better because it implies that each player has to work for it to the best of their abilities, we're just establishing fair rules for the g

I think that is a lot better because it implies that each player has to work for it to the best of their abilities, we're just establishing fair rules for the game. There's another term I'm seeing misinterpreted earlier in the thread too that is relevant. We use mathematical distribution of income growth over the population as the metric and people misinterpret it to mean distribution of wealth in the Marxist sense. It's just a measurement of who has what, but it implies a solution (to some) that has a lot of political baggage.