3 ms·
Maybe we should compensate workers based on responsibilities (ie dependents I was following you up until this notion. Compensation has nothing to do with a wor
by jbuzbee 11y ago
Maybe we should compensate workers based on responsibilities (ie dependents
I was following you up until this notion. Compensation has nothing to do with a worker's responsibilities. Compensation is based on how much the job is worth to the person or company paying. That's why a brain-surgeon with no dependents is paid more than a ditch-digger with a house full of kids.
- mc32 11y agoI understand, and this is out current model, but some argue for income equality, so I ask what kind of equality? Let's have goals before we discuss the merits.