4 ms·
So what? The "info"graphic just lists some basic nutritional info without much context. It also highlights a few choice ingredients and makes weird comparisons
by mfoy_ 11y ago
So what?
The "info"graphic just lists some basic nutritional info without much context. It also highlights a few choice ingredients and makes weird comparisons like "this is used as a blowing agent in yoga mats!" or "this is a form of butane!" So what?
A lot of fear mongering going on here. I'd be more interested in seeing WHY those chemicals are unsafe for human consumption. Why is double-frying the fries so terrible that it made this list?
I mean don't get me wrong, McDonald's is gross because it tastes bad, but it's not necessarily "filthy" for any of the reasons highlighted here.
EDIT: Also really? "Meat slurry"? Shouldn't we be celebrating the fact that McDonalds is trying to use as much of the animal as possible? If it's tasty enough and nutritional enough isn't that fine? As long as they aren't using the spinal cord or brain tissue there's no real additional risk of exposure to contaminants, right?