And it adds this whole world-collapsing unnecessary machinery that has no practical applications or physical evidence. I myself would prefer Bohmian mechanics i

And it adds this whole world-collapsing unnecessary machinery that has no practical applications or physical evidence. I myself would prefer Bohmian mechanics if we had to choose a single interpretation. Moreover, it's possible to define a non-stochastic version of the theory (no gods playing dice), which would explain QM somewhat like Classical Mechanics explains Thermodynamics; and it's falsifiable by looking for non-equilibrium conditions (admittedly those conditions will be very hard to achieve). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Broglie%E2%80%93Bohm_theory#Relation_to_the_Born_Rule https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Broglie%E2%80%93Bohm_theory... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_non-equilibrium https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_non-equilibrium