3 ms·
Smart use of unicode block elements (2581-2588 if I'm not mistaken), nice trick with the background for that double graph. Edit: Is there a "block-width" space
by leni536 11y ago
Smart use of unicode block elements (2581-2588 if I'm not mistaken), nice trick with the background for that double graph.
Edit:
Is there a "block-width" space in unicode? Like it's nice if one can assume a monospace font, but it would be nice to draw unicode-art using these characters and a space with the same width:
Edit2:
Hey, HN deleted my characters, I meant 2591-2593 (25%, 50%, 75% shading) and 2588(full block). What is missing is the 0%.
- ygra 11y ago> What is missing is the 0%. U+2001, U+2003?
- anon4 11y agoLook at U+2000-2008: M M -- en quad M M -- em quad M M -- en space M M -- em space M M -- three-per-em space M M -- four-per-em space M M -- six-per-em space M M -- figure space M M -- punctuation space I think you want either 2001 - em quad or 2007 - figure space
- leni536 11y agoI tried out them, they don't seem to work with the fonts I tried. I skimmed the unicode standard for "block characters" and I didn't read any constrain for the block characters on width.