6 ms·
First I've heard of this rule/exception, got a link to any doc's validating this claim? If true, it flys in the face of everything on the books with regards to
by zer0defex 11y ago
First I've heard of this rule/exception, got a link to any doc's validating this claim? If true, it flys in the face of everything on the books with regards to mandates/rules/regs for ensuring secure communications for high-level government officials.
Quite interested, as I've been watching this one closely, especially with regards to retro-active changes allowing for an escape from previously committed illegalities.
I fully expect a presidential pardon to be the end-game on this one.
- Retric 11y agoNot the actual regulations but: Hillary Clinton's use of private email not unusual, but still raises questions. http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/politicsnow/la-pn-hillary-clinton-emails-20150303-story.html http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/politicsnow/la-pn-hil... Other government officials, and Secretaries of State before her, had also used private email for official business, and experts agree that this is allowed by federal law in case of emergencies.[25][8][26] The State Department declined to answer questions about whether the private system was widely known within the agency or officially approved.[21] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton_email_controversy#cite_note-nytimes.com-8 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton_email_controve...