3 ms·
You sincerely think that the prosecutors in the cases mentioned in the article purposefully made the case hard for the jury to understand, for the explicit purp
by scott_s 11y ago
You sincerely think that the prosecutors in the cases mentioned in the article purposefully made the case hard for the jury to understand, for the explicit purpose of losing the case?
- coldtea 11y agoNo, for the explicit purpose of making some good money off the table.
- scott_s 11y agoI don't follow. How are the prosecutors making money by losing a case that they decided to prosecute?
- Kliment 11y agoI'm not coldtea but the implication appears to be that they are being bribed
- coldtea 11y agoYes. Don't know about those specific cases but I know places where this happens a lot, and especially when it comes to white collar crime, but also mafia-with-a-legit-front kind of affairs.
- scott_s 11y agoThis is a conversational dead-end because there is both no evidence for it in this case, and no way to disprove it.
- coldtea 11y ago>This is a conversational dead-end because there is both no evidence for it in this case, and no way to disprove it. Doesn't that make it a conversational endless road? Being able to prove or disprove it would make it a dead-end, getting the conversation to stop :-)