5 ms·
"Just imagine what would happen if these people started forcefully expressing and defending their views on this thread?" The best way to avoid this fate is to
by plinkplonk 17y ago
"Just imagine what would happen if these people started forcefully expressing and defending their views on this thread?"
The best way to avoid this fate is to flag such articles into oblivion.
"Anything from the New Yorker is basically automatically on topic because of its intellectual weight."
That's the stupidest rationale for a submission I've ever read on HN. What is "on topic" for an HN submission has nothing to do with who wrote it. And no one has automatic "intellectual weight" for anything they write.
The fact that you have to make such a logic free statement indicates that you know you are trolling/ karma whoring.
I guess it is fine to occasionally test the strength of HN's immune system.
- 1gor 17y agoyou know you are trolling/ karma whoring. Is this in reply to my comment or the parent?
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- rms 17y agoI think he meant to reply to me since he quotes my post.
- rms 17y agoCan you show me when the New Yorker has published a recent journalistic article that has been wrong? Karma whoring? Trolling? It's been a while since anyone actually accused me of trolling, but this is a meta-discussion worth having.