> While everything you said is true, I feel its worth pointing out entanglement is stronger than simply being able to generate the same number in two locations,

> While everything you said is true, I feel its worth pointing out entanglement is stronger than simply being able to generate the same number in two locations, a feat easily accomplished via classical means. Really? That's not random, that's pseudo-random, so the secret is still just the seed distributed before hand. True randomness would be entirely uninvolved from other state, including location or time. This is really just combining the sharing and the generating into one process so you CAN share true randomness without sharing other state.