I'm just going to re-reply to this since it's 8 hours later: not one poster in this thread was able to bring up a single shred of evidence that supported the id

I'm just going to re-reply to this since it's 8 hours later: not one poster in this thread was able to bring up a single shred of evidence that supported the idea Ahmed's treatment was due to his race or religion, or indeed due to anything other than the same nonsense zero-tolerance policies we're all familiar with. I conclude that this idea exists purely as a media-created fantasy. "Racism exists, therefore that's what happened in this case.".