3 ms·
The problem, in my mind, is that as other container formats that have been in the shadows due to Docker's huge mindshare could easily supplant Docker if other m
by geerlingguy 11y ago
The problem, in my mind, is that as other container formats that have been in the shadows due to Docker's huge mindshare could easily supplant Docker if other major providers start switching their language away from 'Docker containers' to just 'containers' (witness existing language around ECS from Amazon), and pointing to a different format as their de-facto standard.
Hosting companies will do what's in their best interest, and competing against an 'official' Docker container hosting solution might be less appealing than telling customers about their own system that uses (what may or may not be) a 'better' container format.
- enos_feedler 11y agoWell the bigger problem is if there becomes multiple container formats and everyone doesn't adopt the same one. Hopefully when everyone talks about "containers" in the future they are referring to OCI compatible ones. I don't think companies should want to lock you in with container formats. The ones that do should die. They should lock you in with services. IBM should lock you into its cloud by making you depend on Watson API, for instance.