4 ms·
> Flash plugin missing > Get the latest Flash player to view this content No, I won't. This scares me too much: https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/
by OMGWTF 11y ago
> Flash plugin missing
> Get the latest Flash player to view this content
No, I won't. This scares me too much:
https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-53/product_id-6761/Adobe-Flash-Player.html https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-53/p...
- annnnd 11y ago+1. Not sure why anyone would want to play video (I guess it's a video? I don't do Flash either) through Flash nowadays... Isn't it easier and better to just use HTML video tag?
- biokoda 11y agoWith live video you don't really have a choice if you want compatibility with all browsers.
- annnnd 11y agoNot really - there is no flash on (most?) mobile devices. You can also use JS detection. For instance, Youtube uses Flash unless you allow google.com & googlevideo.com, then it uses HTML video tag. It's not like it costs you anything to add HTML video tag.
- biokoda 11y agolive video. There is no cross browser compatible format for live streaming.
- annnnd 11y agoSorry, missed "live" word. I don't have any (recent) experience with that, so can't comment on that. But in case of OP's page the video is not live.
- mdaniel 11y agoYou can also submit your preference to YouTube, even if you _do_ have Flash: https://www.youtube.com/html5 https://www.youtube.com/html5
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- fowlduck 11y agoI'll transcode the vid and set up videojs properly, if it'll help
- mdaniel 11y agoI especially enjoyed this comment from a user entitled OMGWTF :-)