> Fact 1: Ahmed claimed to have "invented" this clock in a video. Which he did. He invented his particular clock arrangement. Not clocks in general... he's lik

> Fact 1: Ahmed claimed to have "invented" this clock in a video. Which he did. He invented his particular clock arrangement. Not clocks in general... he's like... 3000 years too late on that front. Yes, it wasn't a complex project... but he's 17, who cares. Has no relevance to the subsequent school or police action. > Fact 2: [...] Who plugs in an alarm clock in English class? Teenagers, ones showing off their stuff to friends in particular. Has no relevance to the subsequent school or police action. > Fact 3: [...] He did otherwise. Because teenagers always listen to teachers, right? Worst case - confiscate it until the end of the day, maybe a detention. Has no relevance to the subsequent school or police action. > Fact 4: There is no legitimate evidence that this incident was based on race. Plenty of white kids getting kicked out of school for toy guns. Well... the police statements at the time were certainly racially ill-advised, but I'll give you this one under extreme charity. If you don't think that being brown skinned and named Ahmed Mohamed had anything to do with the over-reaction then I have a bridge to sell you. This is pretty obvious from you "legitimate evidence" dog whistle... as there's plenty of circumstantial and social evidence, but I doubt you'd call that "legitimate". So far you're 1 for 4 here, not doing well. > Fact 5: His dad is a known political agitator Literally has nothing to do with Ahmed. So.. again has no relevance to the subsequent school or police action. For being "against me" the facts you provide are pretty junk.