4 ms·
The frequency is not really relevant. It was and is legal and faced no real opposition. >The purpose of the bulk surveillance is absolutely NOT to gather evide
by beeboop 11y ago
The frequency is not really relevant. It was and is legal and faced no real opposition.
>The purpose of the bulk surveillance is absolutely NOT to gather evidence against citizens.
They admit themselves they gather bulk data on everything. The intent of an organization that has proven to lie through their teeth and break the law really means nothing. Intent is also pointless, the action is what matters.
>In fact, it is used agains foreigners only for national security and intelligence purposes.
This is simply not true.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/27/nsa-employee-spied-detection-internal-memo http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/27/nsa-employee-sp...
www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/26/nsa-porn-muslims_n_4346128.htm
www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2013/08/23/bloomberg_report_nsa_employees_have_deliberately_abused_their_power.html
http://www.businessinsider.com/how-nsa-can-abuse-data-on-americans-2013-7 http://www.businessinsider.com/how-nsa-can-abuse-data-on-ame...
https://www.rt.com/usa/nsa-domestic-surveillance-abuse-684/ https://www.rt.com/usa/nsa-domestic-surveillance-abuse-684/
There are hundreds of resources and examples showing rampant abuse and non-security related surveillance of Americans.
edit: don't forget its use for corporate espionage: http://sputniknews.com/latam/20150707/1024322295.html http://sputniknews.com/latam/20150707/1024322295.html
- grkvlt 11y agoThe cases you are citing are all unauthorized accesses and abuses, not systematic government policy. Your argument seems to be that because a law could be broken, then it must be being broken, which is hardly useful.
- beeboop 11y agoThe law can be broken, there is abundant evidence that it is broken constantly, and there is very little to no accountability when it is broken. There may as well be no law at all. The entire fucking program was illegal for years and it didn't stop them. They literally don't give a shit if what they're doing is illegal.
- PlzSnow 11y agoYour supposition that "there may as well be no laws at all" is very extreme and no credible person would support it.