> I'm not asking for professional diagnosis, just a quick BigData/Image analysis There is a reason these kind of analyses are still done by humans, even with e

> I'm not asking for professional diagnosis, just a quick BigData/Image analysis There is a reason these kind of analyses are still done by humans, even with extremely high resolution images, with the proper contrast. Big Data is not a solution to every analysis problem. > i mean you can see the guy's balls even on that downscaled image And if he had testicular cancer, it would be a tiny speck on those balls. Also, compare the humans you see in that image to a picture of a simple chest X-ray. Notice how you can see barely any internal structure? This image can diagnosis that they all have two lungs, but not much else.