3 ms·
Look at it this way. There could still be an overall high-score leaderboard. This could simply be a filter applied to that leaderboard. On most leaderboards, I
by hkuo 17y ago
Look at it this way. There could still be an overall high-score leaderboard. This could simply be a filter applied to that leaderboard. On most leaderboards, I could really care less about who anyone is, as I have no clue who they are, and only care about where I stand in it. But if I could apply this filter to the leaderboard where I would then be able to recognize almost everyone, then I would find it much more interesting to scan. Additional filters could be applied on top of this, such as movie stars, athletes, or like Compete.com, have the ability to compare specific celebrities, on individual games, or on multiple games.
- jodrellblank 17y agoThat's a different idea rather than looking at the same idea in a different way, but it's completely dissipated the annoyance feeling. That is, as long as the main focus was on the overall scoreboard and the filters were optional. If the main focus was on the celebrity board and removing the default filters was optional that would be annoying again (although less so than a completely separate board).