4 ms·
I believe it will continue to grow but not as fast as it needs to be any serious competitor to Windows or MacOS in 2010. It still lacks a good-enought variety
by cschwarm 17y ago
I believe it will continue to grow but not as fast as it needs to be any serious competitor to Windows or MacOS in 2010.
It still lacks a good-enought variety of (proprietary) third-party applications and games.
This is what most of the younger power users care about -- and they are the ones who learn computer usage most easily. But there's no compelling reason for them to try or to switch to Linux.
What blocks the supply of third-party applications is the lack of a default decentral installer on the major Linux distributions. APT just doens't cut it. In a recent review of using a Macbook, former GNOME Quality Control lead, Luis Villa, wrote [1]:
"...installing new software [on a Mac] is insanely nice. Yes, apt and yum are nice, but I don’t find out about software that way. I find out about software by reading something on the web (for me usually a blog post, but for others a news article) and from there installation on mac is a click, download, and drag away. That is it. That is insanely great."
I do find new software like that, too, but APT wasn't made for this use case. As a result, I stopped reading reviews of Linux applications. Most of the time, it's a hassle to get the dicussed software installed, for they are often not available in Ubuntu's repositories or it's an old version.
I also stopped buying or reading Linux magazines or journals for this reason.
So, even if there are new great applications out there, the word spreads slowly. As a result, Linux appears to be boring and to lack behind the other two OSes. It's simply more fun to use Windows or MacOS for a power user.
And if the majority of power users don't switch, the less literate users are not going to be convinenced to switch, either. Neither more advertising nor having Linux pre-installed will change that, in my opinion.
[1]: http://tieguy.org/blog/2009/12/23/continued-notes-on-the-macbook-experiment-week-3/ http://tieguy.org/blog/2009/12/23/continued-notes-on-the-mac...
- sielskr 17y ago_APT just doens't cut it. In a recent review of using a Macbook, former GNOME Quality Control lead, Luis Villa, wrote [1]: "...installing new software [on a Mac] is insanely nice._ _Upgrading_ software under APT (or Arch Linux's pacman) is very nice. On the Mac, though, each software publisher rolls their own way of upgrading installed application; do they not? But, yeah, Linux lacks proprietary applications.