3 ms·
Sure but GWT == writing Java, downloading an heavy an complex SDK , and writing imperative UIs. Sure it comes with widgets but you can find the same widgets in
by aikah 11y ago
Sure but GWT == writing Java, downloading an heavy an complex SDK , and writing imperative UIs. Sure it comes with widgets but you can find the same widgets in JS.
Compare with React,AngularJS and co : way more popular,declarative UIs , if you need static typing you can use Typescript which needs no heavy runtime.
GWT might make sense for some LOB app for desktop but not for a mobile webpage.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- DCoder 11y agoGoogle Closure Compiler [1] can also perform dead code removal, but it requires extra work annotating all public APIs and naturally it can't cope with dynamic/indirect calls. [1]: https://developers.google.com/closure/compiler/ https://developers.google.com/closure/compiler/
- warfangle 11y agoSo does UglifyJS. At least, obviously dead code (e.g., if(false) {} )