2 ms·
> I'm not saying it's technically legal, just that the legal repercussions are so low that no one seriously considers them when choosing whether or not to smoke
by copsarebastards 11y ago
> I'm not saying it's technically legal, just that the legal repercussions are so low that no one seriously considers them when choosing whether or not to smoke marijuana.
> Is that not an accurate statement?
That is not an accurate statement. Incarceration isn't enough of a legal repercussion for you? Plenty of people are incarcerated each year for possession.
Also, you've significantly backpedaled by saying "choosing whether to smoke marijuana". "Marijuana is legal" is a statement about a lot more crimes than smoking (which in fact is actually legal--if somehow a lit joint fell out of the sky and landed on your lips, it would be legal to inhale). Possession, manufacture, sale, and paraphernalia are all illegal. A large portion of people incarcerated for marijuana-related crimes are incarcerated for crimes that aren't smoking or even possession.
And that's not even looking at drug testing and its employment implications.
- herbig 11y agoYeah I don't think I'm backpedalling. I'm actually starting to question your sanity, but I guess we'll have to disagree.
- copsarebastards 11y ago"Marijuana is de-facto legal" to "smoking marijuana is de-facto legal" is a huge backpedal.