3 ms·
I think this is a bit of a misleading title. At one point in grad school, I had broke 225 @ 6'3 with little muscle mass and I've changed that to 188 with much m
by keefe 17y ago
I think this is a bit of a misleading title. At one point in grad school, I had broke 225 @ 6'3 with little muscle mass and I've changed that to 188 with much more muscle mass. My understanding is that fat is used for storing food energy and that each pound of fat stores ~3500 calories. So, something like dFat/dt = (f(calories in) - caloriesBurned())/3500 = amount of fat gained for some period of time. f might include something about the structure of the calories coming in, but it makes sense and my experience supports it.
- natrius 17y agoI'm guessing you didn't watch the video. Sure, the lower your net caloric intake, the less weight you will gain. However, the types of food you eat have different effects on how much you want to eat. Therefore, if you eat different foods, you'll be more likely to lose weight.
- keefe 17y agoIt's a bit long, I read one of the supposedly accurate summaries... I'm OK with that idea, my main comment was on the title - doesn't exactly debunk the model, just some supplement regarding a "fullness factor" nothing new there imho.