4 ms·
>>standards-compliant condom Wait, there's a standard for that? What is it, ISO-69? Did they also standardize the different sizes and textures? Regardless, I
by breischl 11y ago
>>standards-compliant condom
Wait, there's a standard for that? What is it, ISO-69? Did they also standardize the different sizes and textures?
Regardless, I bet it was an interesting working group.
- DanBC 11y agohttp://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=45589 http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=45589 Slides from the workshop? http://www.path.org/publications/files/RH_condom_wrkshp_session5_en.pdf http://www.path.org/publications/files/RH_condom_wrkshp_sess...
- wmeredith 11y ago69? Haha. It's actually 23409:2011