4 ms·
>There are a few methods known since sixties, with less side effects than female hormonal contraception Such as?
by BeefySwain 11y ago
>There are a few methods known since sixties, with less side effects than female hormonal contraception
Such as?
- jkot 11y agohttp://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/722423_5 http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/722423_5 google cache: https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:50H_2S_02_sJ:www.medscape.com/viewarticle/722423_5+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=gr https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:50H_2S...
- LesZedCB 11y agoDo you have a link that's not behind a paywall? Can you describe the abstract?
- scythe 11y ago>This study revealed that 70% of 271 patients became azoospermic after 6 months of treatment. The mean time to azoospermia was 3 months. The azoospermic patients were enrolled in a 12-month efficacy phase, where one pregnancy occurred. Sperm reappeared in the ejaculate in 11 patients. Once the testosterone was discontinued, the mean time to sperm recovery was 3.7 months. Of note, this international study revealed that 91% of Asian and 60% of Caucasian patients became azoospermic, suggesting an ethnic difference in endocrine response. This difference has been seen in subsequent studies. Possible explanations include fivefold differences α-reductase levels in these groups, This is your solution? This isn't marketable because you can't have six-month induction periods with repeated testing for azoospermia that only works on 3/4 of patients in the first place. That's a practical problem, not a political one.