3 ms·
I think a lot of people's problem with this is that it's not very transparent. You don't find out who Carney is until the very bottom of the article, and it's
by amyjess 11y ago
I think a lot of people's problem with this is that it's not very transparent.
You don't find out who Carney is until the very bottom of the article, and it's presented as just another journalistic article published by Medium and not an official rebuttal by the company.
If the whole thing was prefixed with "Following is Amazon's official rebuttal to the New York Times article", I don't think many people would have a problem with it.
- danso 11y agoFair enough...I saw his name at the top and immediately knew who he was but only because I work in media. However, Carney would be right to assume that his main audience -- the media -- will also recognize his role. That said, I don't know if this is them trying to be intentionally deceptive or if this is just a clunky use of the medium (no pun intended). It is his first post on Medium, and it's written not in the first-person (as a way to make a personal connection with the reader) but uses "we", e.g. "We were in regular communication with Ms. Kantor from February through the publication date in mid-August"...I don't think there's much evidence to show that they are trying to hide the author's bias or position, other than it's on Medium and not on news.amazon.com.
- srtjstjsj 11y agoWhat's a "journalist article"? Medium is a blog host, not a newspaper. Medium is just paste.org with a better UI.