3 ms·
One can like or hate Amazon, and it may or may not be a crappy place to work. That said, it sounds like NYT (a newspaper of record, btw) did more than reasonab
by lpsz 11y ago
One can like or hate Amazon, and it may or may not be a crappy place to work.
That said, it sounds like NYT (a newspaper of record, btw) did more than reasonable selective reporting, to evoke certain feelings in the readers, to get clicks, to start a conversation, or what the reason may be. And it's lousy to see this in modern news reporting. Even the respectable publications err on the side of sensationalism, and it's notoriously hard to get unbiased information as a reader.
Where can someone go to read unbiased, well-researched, both-sides-of-the-story news?
- radiorental 11y ago"Where can someone go to read unbiased, well-researched, both-sides-of-the story news?" I personally think we're spoilt for choice. Just bear in mind everyone, everywhere has an inherent bias. Some more so that others. I read these to get what I feel is a well rounded opinion http://america.aljazeera.com/ http://america.aljazeera.com/ http://www.bbc.com/news http://www.bbc.com/news
- caskance 11y agoWhy would such a place exist? The more unbiased a news outlet is trusted to be, the higher the incentive to subvert them to show bias towards you.
- roymurdock 11y agoReuters. They're also the most boring/uninformative. Al Jazeera, The Economist, Bloomberg, and Quartz have well-researched and relevant stories but they usually come with a bias.