Exactly. While an interesting read in showing how people can be wrong about later hits, this study is meaningless unless the failures are included. It is like l

Exactly. While an interesting read in showing how people can be wrong about later hits, this study is meaningless unless the failures are included. It is like looking at all the winners of the superb owl, finding some negative comments about them, and then saying "see, you shouldn't listen to anyone". What about all the teams that didn't win and had good comments? Or bad?