They have legal grounds to sue them clearly, in the sense that they have at least superficially plausible causes of action. If they didn't then they wouldn't ha

They have legal grounds to sue them clearly, in the sense that they have at least superficially plausible causes of action. If they didn't then they wouldn't have been able to find a lawyer past the bar willing to file a summons and complaint. In the US of course one can be sued for just about any vaguely plausible set of damages. That doesn't mean that they have prevailed on the facts and the law. The next step then, by definition, is to hear a response from people who are otherwise in a life position where they find themselves writing Amazon reviews for $5 or less.