3 ms·
So this material was valuable enough to blog, but not valuable enough to proofread? I don't follow that logic. I can't imagine posting writing or an interview t
by wyclif 11y ago
So this material was valuable enough to blog, but not valuable enough to proofread? I don't follow that logic. I can't imagine posting writing or an interview that hasn't been proofed. I think an interview with Schmidt would demand at least a first-pass edit.
- srtjstjsj 11y agoSo proofread it yourself, or stop complaining about stuff people give you for free.
- teddyh 11y agoYou got wyclif’s comments for free, stop complaining about them.
- wyclif 11y agoYour logic fails. I should proofread someone else's blog post because they didn't, or else I shouldn't complain? Mmmmm. Got it. You obviously don't even understand what writing is, on the internet or anywhere else. Writing is done as a service to the reader. If you can't be bothered to do an edit and correct obvious spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors, you're telling your readers that what you've written isn't very important, interesting, or worth reading.
- code_sterling 11y agoThen don't read it, don't up vote it, and move on. You aren't adding to the conversation.
- wyclif 11y agoSaying to a critic "don't read it" actually doesn't add anything to the conversation. So touché.
- code_sterling 11y agoYou aren't a critic, you're just being critical.