>Because many of them dropped/stopped out of Stanford after being accepted. Really? There's obviously a few well known cases of this, but I doubt you're lookin

>Because many of them dropped/stopped out of Stanford after being accepted. Really? There's obviously a few well known cases of this, but I doubt you're looking at any hard data when you make this claim. >Outliers can't be analyzed using aggregate methods. Powerlawpeople. Sure you can. When you're comparing 500 billionaires, they're no longer the outliers in the data set. They're the norm for the data set.