3 ms·
Oh, well, pagerank is based off ranking published papers anyway: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citation_analysis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citation_analysis
by seiji 11y ago
Oh, well, pagerank is based off ranking published papers anyway: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citation_analysis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citation_analysis
- jmnicholson 11y agothe idea is here: https://thewinnower.com/papers/the-r-factor-a-measure-of-scientific-veracity https://thewinnower.com/papers/the-r-factor-a-measure-of-sci...
- nostrademons 11y agoThere are two questions you should be asking yourself: 1. Will a person in your target market, when cherry-picking a couple examples they care about, say "Wow, these results are way better than what I would've found myself!"? 2. Are there enough people in your target market to justify the economics of your system? Answer #2 first, and then put all your effort into making #1 come true. Google worked because everybody searches the web, and Google was clearly better than rival search engines. Many metric-based businesses fail because not enough people care about the metrics to make enough money; the remainder fail because they're not a noticeable-enough improvement on the status quo.