3 ms·
* It's like the equivalent of mandatory GMO labeling, but with GMO replaced by being made by a big company.* Exactly. You get the point. This should be used t
by eveningcoffee 11y ago
* It's like the equivalent of mandatory GMO labeling, but with GMO replaced by being made by a big company.*
Exactly. You get the point. This should be used to reduce the impression of false diversity.
Edit:
Lets expand this example even further. Lets say that there is company X with one baby formula and company Y with another baby formula. Company X has created 9 different brands to sell its baby formula but company Y has only one.
For a customer of baby formulas it would create an impression that there is wide diversity of baby formulas when in fact there are only two.
- srtjstjsj 11y agoWhat is wrong with false impression of diversity, and why is the manufacturer responsible for it? Do you think it discourages a consumer from creating more diversity?
- eveningcoffee 11y ago> What is wrong with false impression of diversity, You are asking what is wrong with lying. How should I answer to this?