3 ms·
I read this paragraph > "I think Snowden played a very important role in educating the American public ... he did break the law, and I think there should be a
by newjersey 11y ago
I read this paragraph
> "I think Snowden played a very important role in educating the American public ... he did break the law, and I think there should be a penalty to that," Sanders said. He went on to say that the role Snowden played in educating the public about violations of their civil liberties should be considered before he is sentenced, and that as president he would "absolutely" end the NSA spying programs in question.
and I would have disagreed with the analysis
> To read between the lines: Bernie thinks Edward Snowden did the right thing, but hey, laws are laws. If elected, though, it sounds like he'll make sure Snowden gets a really nice jail cell.
and said something along the lines of "the political system pardoned President Nixon without even going through the trouble of actually charging him with a crime. If a man like Nixon deserves pardon, I'd say Snowden does as well." But I am not Bernie Sanders and I can't put words in his mouth. He urged Snowden to come home and face trial. This may be a comforting thing for the people at home who watch the 8 PM news but this is not the right thing to do. Not in a nation that pardons people before they are convicted of a crime. No, I don't mean we should dig up Nixon's grave and hang, quarter, and draw his body (I wouldn't oppose doing so to Margaret Thatcher as the UK a historical precedence of such actions but that is off-topic). I don't even want to charge Nixon. All I am saying is there is a way to grant Edward Snowden the same amnesty and immunity that we gave President Nixon. Not because what the the two did were similar but I bring it up just as a demonstration of the things we have forgiven and forgotten as a nation.
Edward Snowden did is a huge public service and he deserves our thanks for it. I am not the person above but this is why I am a little disappointed. I am a little concerned about Bernie Sanders saying as president he would "absolutely" end the NSA spying programs in question. Does the POTUS have access to everything that goes on in the NSA? Can't the programs continue/reboot under a different pretense? Worst case, if a president can put the program to sleep, what is to stop the next president to reanimate it?
- cmrdporcupine 11y agoI'm the person above and I endorse your comments generally. That said I am Canadian, so American laws concern me less. Snowden did the world a favour, not just the US public, by exposing what many of us already suspected was happening. Sanders has exposed himself in this as far less radical than he likes to market himself as. As a person running in an election to be a _lawmaker_ he has every right, actually responsibility, to criticize the laws that would imprison Snowden, and to agitate to recognize the problems Snowden pointed out.
- ganeumann 11y agoActually, he is currently a lawmaker. He is running to be the person who executes the laws. Of course, this just makes his position worse.
- Retra 11y agoSnowden is already living with the consequences of having broken the law. I don't see how putting him in jail improves anything, and Sanders' answer is one of appealing to moderation in a reflexive and thoughtless "everything is a compromise" stance.
- dllthomas 11y agoI find it notable that Snowden has been in exile longer than Martin Luther King spent in jail, in total, over the course of his life.