3 ms·
I think the submission here on HN has overdone it on the title. It doesn't compute "flops" like a traditional computer. The relevant text from the article: "T
by sounds 11y ago
I think the submission here on HN has overdone it on the title.
It doesn't compute "flops" like a traditional computer. The relevant text from the article:
"The prototype achieves a processing speed equivalent to 320 Gflops and it is incredibly energy efficient as it uses low-powered, cost effective components."
I am as interested as anybody in switching out for photons instead of electrons/holes. But please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait.
- dang 11y agoOk, we took "32O Gflop" out of the title. If anyone suggests a better title we can change it again.