That's a fundamental architecture problem with a lot of software: it's not possible to get most useful upgrades without accepting the rest of the changes. This

That's a fundamental architecture problem with a lot of software: it's not possible to get most useful upgrades without accepting the rest of the changes. This is sad for security because people see things like "stupid UI changes" and they make upgrade decisions based on the parts of the change that are most visible instead of the parts that are most valuable. Software should probably be designed so that it can be distributed in a layered fashion. I shouldn't want "git cherry-pick" every time I click an Update button.