2 ms·
Average employee seems like a poor metric, considering that employee count increases exponentially. I'd be interested a breakdown based on "joined at funding s
by hkmurakami 11y ago
Average employee seems like a poor metric, considering that employee count increases exponentially.
I'd be interested a breakdown based on "joined at funding stage X". From what I understand, if you joined Square in 2011, when it was already super hot, you're doing pretty well and could sell your stock on the secondary markets for a handsome windfall even well before this IPO.
- kzhahou 11y agoI agree -- typical pitfall of average. Do you have any sense of what the equity numbers would have been like at year 0, 1, 2, 3... based on your general knowledge of startups (not necessarily Square)?
- hkmurakami 11y agoexponentially decaying.