5 ms·
Other than being fake in every photographic sense it's also scientifically fake. Obviously icebergs don't have that much under the water and they look signific
by aaron695 11y ago
Other than being fake in every photographic sense it's also scientifically fake.
Obviously icebergs don't have that much under the water and they look significantly different in the underwater section.
I couldn't see it getting much faker.
- nkurz 11y agoObviously icebergs don't have that much under the water What do you mean, and in what sense is this obvious?
- bmm6o 11y ago> Obviously icebergs don't have that much under the water The popular notion that 90% is underwater is approximately correct: http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/?pageName=iipHowMuchOfAnIcebergIsBelowTheWater http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/?pageName=iipHowMuchOfAnIcebergIs.... Or are you claiming that the picture in question doesn't represent a 10/90 split?